
\begin{table}[H]
\begin{center}
\begin{small}
\begin{tabular}{l D{.}{.}{4.5} D{.}{.}{4.5} D{.}{.}{4.5} D{.}{.}{4.5}}
\toprule
 & \multicolumn{1}{c}{External Efficacy} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Satisfaction with Democracy} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Internal Efficacy} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{Political Interest} \\
\midrule
Group 2                 & -0.14^{*}   & -0.16^{**} & 0.07       & 0.05       \\
                        & (0.07)      & (0.07)     & (0.09)     & (0.08)     \\
Wave 3                  & -0.21^{***} & -0.15^{**} & -0.24^{**} & -0.17^{**} \\
                        & (0.07)      & (0.07)     & (0.09)     & (0.08)     \\
Group 2 $\times$ Wave 3 & 0.01        & 0.13       & 0.07       & 0.01       \\
                        & (0.11)      & (0.10)     & (0.14)     & (0.11)     \\
(Intercept)             & 3.06^{***}  & 3.76^{***} & 3.42^{***} & 3.52^{***} \\
                        & (0.05)      & (0.05)     & (0.07)     & (0.05)     \\
\midrule
R$^2$                   & 0.02        & 0.01       & 0.01       & 0.01       \\
N                       & 1275        & 1287       & 1276       & 1289       \\
\bottomrule
\multicolumn{5}{l}{\tiny{\footnotesize $^{***}p<0.01$; $^{**}p<0.05$; $^{*}p<0.1$}}
\end{tabular}
\end{small}
\caption{The effect of regaining eligibility. Presented estimates capture the results from DiD-specifications comparing groups 1 and 2 across waves2 and 3. Based on a birthdates sample with bandwidth 300.}
\label{table:coefficients}
\end{center}
\end{table}
